Ryan Batch

Esri Maps & Layers

Simplifying complex tools through clear language and familiar patterns.

About the project

Mapping tools were powerful but difficult to use. Legacy patterns, dense terminology, and limited flexibility created friction for both new and experienced users. This work focused on redesigning a critical part of the mapping experience so it aligned with how users think, speak, and work.

Role

  • Senior Product Designer
  • UX and UI designer
  • UX writing contributor
  • User Researcher

Focus

  • Complex Mapping Applications
  • Applied design systems
  • Interaction design
  • UX writing and language

Outcome

The experience became easier to understand, faster to use, and easier to teach. Language was simplified. Interactions aligned with familiar patterns. New capabilities were introduced without increasing cognitive load.

Project Overview

At the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping tools were powerful but difficult to use. Legacy patterns, dense terminology, and limited flexibility created friction for both new and experienced users. This work focused on redesigning a critical part of the mapping experience so it aligned with how users think, speak, and work. Mapping workflows were central to the product suite and tightly connected to other systems. Even small improvements had an outsized impact. Layer Preferences was a high-friction area that affected daily workflows, training, and support. The opportunity was to reduce complexity without reducing capability.

The Challenge

  • Dense, technical language
  • Legacy interaction patterns
  • Limited discoverability
  • High training overhead
  • Inconsistent behavior across tools
  • Users had to adapt to the system instead of the system adapting to users.

    Layer Overview

The Approach

We took a holistic view of the mapping tools across the agency so we could apply methods that would scale.

Ground decisions in user understanding

We leveraged existing research, personas, and archetypes to anchor decisions in real workflows and mental models.

  • Mapped user mental models
  • Aligned design decisions with research
  • Validated with real workflows
  • This ensured the redesign reflected how users actually work, not how the system was structured.

    Layer language mapping
    Layer language mapping

    Simplify through language

    A major focus was UX writing. Plain language replaced technical terminology.

  • Labels reflected user vocabulary
  • Descriptions clarified intent and impact
  • Removed jargon throughout the interface
  • Language became a design tool, not an afterthought.

    Layer UI update

    Apply consistent patterns

    The redesign used established patterns from the design system.

  • Familiar interactions reduced learning effort
  • Reusable components ensured consistency
  • New patterns introduced only when necessary
  • This reinforced predictability across the system.

    Layer side drawer update

    Add flexibility without friction

    New capabilities were introduced carefully.

  • Layer search improved discoverability
  • Reordering supported user workflows
  • Preferences became easier to scan and manage
  • Functionality increased while effort decreased.

    Layer search update

    What Changed

      The redesigned interface made layer management intuitive and powerful. Users could accomplish complex tasks more easily.

    • Reduced cognitive load
    • Faster onboarding for new users
    • Easier training and support
    • Clearer alignment with other tools in the suite
    • The redesign demonstrated how small, focused improvements could have system-level impact.

      Layer drawer animation 1

    Why This Matters

      Complex tools don't have to feel complicated. By combining human-centered language, familiar interaction patterns, and system-aware design we created an experience that respected both user needs and technical constraints.

    Multidisciplinary Designer